Going the distance

This forum can be broken out into additional areas as topic trends begin to develop.

Going the distance

Postby Enzo » Tue May 03, 2016 10:08 am

SO traditionally, the odometer on the car was a mechanical thing, and if one were so inclined, one could jack up the rear end, put the car into reverse and let it run and it would subtract miles from the odometer reading.

Nowdays they are digital. I wonder if the same thing can happen, reverse driving subtracts miles, or does it recognize that travel in either direction is still travel, and it counts reverse miles same as forward?

Inquiring mind wants to know.
E Pluribus Condom
User avatar
Enzo
Enlightened One
Enlightened One
Chortling with glee!
 
Posts: 11956
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 5:30 am
Location: Lansing, Michigan

Re: Going the distance

Postby Heid the Ba » Tue May 03, 2016 1:58 pm

Enzo wrote:SO traditionally, the odometer on the car was a mechanical thing, and if one were so inclined, one could jack up the rear end, put the car into reverse and let it run and it would subtract miles from the odometer reading.

On some models it was possible to disconnect the odometer and take a power drill to it to reduce the mileage.

Nowdays they are digital. I wonder if the same thing can happen, reverse driving subtracts miles, or does it recognize that travel in either direction is still travel, and it counts reverse miles same as forward?
Inquiring mind wants to know.

I have no idea, and it is unlikely I'll ever drive far enough in reverse to find out.
Get it up ye.
User avatar
Heid the Ba
Enlightened One
Enlightened One
Tree hugging, veggie, sandal wearing, pinko Euroweasel
Mr. Sexy Ass
 
Posts: 107598
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:20 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: Going the distance

Postby Lianachan » Tue May 03, 2016 2:01 pm

I had no idea that distance driven in reverse was subtracted from mileage. I've certainly heard of the practice of putting the mileage back, but I thought there'd have been more to it than that.
A-nis bidh fios aig daoine nuair a tha mi a 'mionnachadh aig dhaibh.
User avatar
Lianachan
Enlightened One
Enlightened One
Tits and Nazis though.... Worth investigating
 
Posts: 8786
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:12 pm
Location: A' Ghàidhealtachd, Alba

Re: Going the distance

Postby Enzo » Tue May 03, 2016 3:06 pm

Yes, the power drill method is much more efficient, but it does leave tell-tale evidence of tampering in the dust under the dash. The jack up the car idea is really more of an idea than anything practical. Think Ferris Bueller movie.

And the odometer incremental counter itself is the same as the thing in an old cassette deck or something. Someone familiar with them can take it out, and by holding the pawl back, can spin the wheels freely to whatever setting they want. it can be difficult to get the numbers properly aligned, and this method also leaves clear evidence of tampering. Of course the consumer will never take his dashboard apart, but if someone were to investigate...

I suppose I'll just have to drive in reverse a couple tenths of a mile if I want to know.
E Pluribus Condom
User avatar
Enzo
Enlightened One
Enlightened One
Chortling with glee!
 
Posts: 11956
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 5:30 am
Location: Lansing, Michigan

Re: Going the distance

Postby Мастер » Tue May 03, 2016 3:52 pm

Lianachan wrote:I had no idea that distance driven in reverse was subtracted from mileage. I've certainly heard of the practice of putting the mileage back, but I thought there'd have been more to it than that.


I think this appeared in Ferris Bueller's Day Off (or have I mixed up my films), although I assumed the people doing it were confused. I didn't realise this was a technique that actually worked.

Enzo wrote:it can be difficult to get the numbers properly aligned, and this method also leaves clear evidence of tampering.


If you drove it a short distance after doing this, would the alignment straighten out, or would it be permanently misaligned?

I once knew someone (this was in the US) who bought a used Honda Prelude, then discovered the service log that came with the vehicle had a record of a maintenance at a higher mileage than was showing on the odometer.
They call me Mr Celsius!
User avatar
Мастер
Moderator
Moderator
Злой Мудак
Mauerspecht
 
Posts: 23936
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:56 pm
Location: Far from Damascus

Re: Going the distance

Postby Lance » Tue May 03, 2016 3:57 pm

I don't think this has worked for a very long time, even on mechanical odometers. They fixed it a long time ago to prevent this kind of fraud.

The numbers would never realign. They move "one space" each time so if you put them together out of alignment that will remain so. I speak from first hand experience.
No trees were killed in the posting of this message.
However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

==========================================

Build a man a fire and he will be warm for a few hours.
Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
User avatar
Lance
Administrator
Administrator
Cheeseburger Swilling Lard-Ass who needs to put down the remote and get off the couch.
 
Posts: 91421
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 5:51 pm
Location: Oswego, IL

Re: Going the distance

Postby Мастер » Tue May 03, 2016 4:19 pm

Lance wrote:I speak from first hand experience.


True confessions?
They call me Mr Celsius!
User avatar
Мастер
Moderator
Moderator
Злой Мудак
Mauerspecht
 
Posts: 23936
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:56 pm
Location: Far from Damascus

Re: Going the distance

Postby Lance » Tue May 03, 2016 4:35 pm

Мастер wrote:
Lance wrote:I speak from first hand experience.


True confessions?

It was a junk car of a friend when I was a teenager. We were just wondering how it worked. But even then, driving in reverse didn't run the numbers backwards.
No trees were killed in the posting of this message.
However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

==========================================

Build a man a fire and he will be warm for a few hours.
Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
User avatar
Lance
Administrator
Administrator
Cheeseburger Swilling Lard-Ass who needs to put down the remote and get off the couch.
 
Posts: 91421
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 5:51 pm
Location: Oswego, IL

Re: Going the distance

Postby MM_Dandy » Tue May 03, 2016 4:45 pm

It didn't work in the movie, either. And the car was supposed to be some sort of classic, like a 60's Jaguar or something.
User avatar
MM_Dandy
Moderator
Moderator
King of Obscurity
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 9:02 pm
Location: Canton, SD, USA

Re: Going the distance

Postby Enzo » Wed May 04, 2016 12:20 pm

The numbers would eventualy realign but each wheel will only snap into sync when it moves. SO if the 10,000's digit is off a hair, you have to drive 10.000 miles for it to increment.

In the movie, it failed largely because he knocked it off the bumper jack and launched it out the rear window.
E Pluribus Condom
User avatar
Enzo
Enlightened One
Enlightened One
Chortling with glee!
 
Posts: 11956
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 5:30 am
Location: Lansing, Michigan

Re: Going the distance

Postby MM_Dandy » Wed May 04, 2016 9:16 pm

Ultimately, yes, but it was realized that the odometer wasn't rolling backwards before that.
User avatar
MM_Dandy
Moderator
Moderator
King of Obscurity
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 9:02 pm
Location: Canton, SD, USA

Re: Going the distance

Postby Enzo » Wed May 04, 2016 10:05 pm

Ah. I have to admit when I watched the movie I didn't watch that close.

Having done a mite of research a moment ago, apparently since the advent of digital car systems, the odometer is now smart and increments regardless of direction. I have no proof yet, but as soon as I back down the highway, I will report.
E Pluribus Condom
User avatar
Enzo
Enlightened One
Enlightened One
Chortling with glee!
 
Posts: 11956
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 5:30 am
Location: Lansing, Michigan

Re: Going the distance

Postby Enzo » Thu May 05, 2016 8:55 pm

I did in fact drive in reverse last night far enough to see that the digital odometer does indeed increment forwards as I drive in reverse.
E Pluribus Condom
User avatar
Enzo
Enlightened One
Enlightened One
Chortling with glee!
 
Posts: 11956
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 5:30 am
Location: Lansing, Michigan

Re: Going the distance

Postby tubeswell » Fri May 06, 2016 2:57 am

But a negative integer added to a positive integer cannot be a more positive integer! [-X There should be a name for that type of odometer.

Image
A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk, I have a work station.

If you are seeing an apparent paradox, that means you are missing something.
User avatar
tubeswell
Enlightened One
Enlightened One
 
Posts: 324867
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:51 am
Location: 129th in-line to the Llama Throne (after the last purge)

Re: Going the distance

Postby MM_Dandy » Fri May 06, 2016 4:01 pm

Seeing as one cannot travel a negative distance, it would be the pedantically correct odometer?
User avatar
MM_Dandy
Moderator
Moderator
King of Obscurity
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 9:02 pm
Location: Canton, SD, USA

Re: Going the distance

Postby Enzo » Sat May 07, 2016 1:29 am

Hmmm, my life has been a series of negative advancements.
E Pluribus Condom
User avatar
Enzo
Enlightened One
Enlightened One
Chortling with glee!
 
Posts: 11956
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 5:30 am
Location: Lansing, Michigan


Return to Science and Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests