umop ap!sdn wrote:I don't see any reason why they'd wait until birth. Some people claim that they remember "falling" or "spiralling" or "getting sucked" into their fetal selves, so maybe it happens somewhere in between.
Whereas if you want my personal stance on the pro-life vs. pro-choice issue, that's another thread entirely. ;) I've seen the topic get dragged off in that direction before.
Conception it is, then. I have no problem with that.
umop ap!sdn wrote:As I understand it, the idea of a soul is an attempt to explain 2 things: consciousness, and the difference between an animate person (or other lifeform) and an inanimate corpse. If souls are for real, then it's reasonable to assume that a person could not function without one and would not be alive.
I agree with that. I've never heard of a religion that considers entities which are neither animated nor self-aware as also having soul. We'll say that everyone has a soul, then.
Do all souls get reincarnated? If not, what happens to them if they are not reincarnated?
umop ap!sdn wrote:Why should that change the sentence? If your soul committed a crime, then it should serve whatever sentence the judge hands out. If there is an entity that we each have that is the agent of consciousness, then that is the entity that will be suffering be it in prison or by means of loss of property, etc.
In other words, your soul, if souls exist, is you. In fact, I would venture to say, with a slightly looser definition of what a soul is, that we all definitely have them - we just don't know whether they survive death. We all have neuroelectrical activity in our brains that animate our bodies - maybe that's all a soul is. Maybe that in itself somehow explains consciousness, without the need for a so called "supernatural" entity that is outside of materialism, outside of a deterministic universe.
It shouldn't change the sentence in my opinion. I'm just asking if it's reasonable to defend yourself by saying that you can't be held responsible for your actions because some criminal soul decided to inhabit your body. It's sort of like saying that I can't be held responsible for my genetic makeup.
We could say that it is the soul which is punished, but then we have another problem. Let's say that a past life incarnation of my soul committed a crime for which the statute of limitations has not yet expired, but died before it could be charged. Let's further say that the offending incarnation was never charged. In addition, we'll also say that it can be determined that it is indeed the same soul which is now me. Should I be charged with the crime?
So, we get to the business of whether or not the soul can survive beyond the death of the body. There are accounts of people having out-of-body experiences while clinically dead.
In my opinion, if a soul is only the neuroelectrical activity of a person, then it really isn't a soul, and this discussion is mute. Or, at the very least, we should be exploring more physical means by which your memories (the actual brain matter which constitutes them, anyway) are transferred.
umop ap!sdn wrote:Some say it does. Many who claim to remember before they came to Earthly existence, having the chance to choose between several possible lives. Some only claim to remember hanging around their parents for a while before conception or before birth.
Ewww...sorry, I really don't like the idea of hanging around my parents before my conception. There's a chance that I may actually witness my conception.
Other than that, I guess I'll have to ask: What do they do in the meantime?