Burned out shell of a United Air Lines Boeing 727 that crashed at Salt Lake City after crash landing short of the runway. Forty-three out of 91 aboard were killed. The pilot was blamed for too high a descent rate during the final approach. (November 11, 1965)
16 August 1965; United Airlines 727; near Lake Forest, IL: The aircraft had a controlled flight into the waters of Lake Michigan while on approach to Chicago. There was no indication of any unusual problem prior to impact. All six crew members and 24 passengers were killed.
Candy wrote:November 11
Candy wrote:Don't make fun of me!
Candy wrote:I had a brown bobbed hair-do, 5'5" or so, and a very neat (pressed uniform).
umop ap!sdn wrote:...they said the evidence points to no souls, therefore no afterlife and nothing to reincarnate.
Her husband, Bruce, remains skeptical. "He started researching to disprove what James was telling us, and ended up proving it all," he said. "I think he believes that James Huston's spirit has manifested itself in our son somehow."
Candy wrote:It happened. I remember it.
I had a brown bobbed hair-do, 5'5" or so, and a very neat (pressed uniform).
I remember to this day. I'd love to know who I was, so I could give comfort to the family I once belonged.
Lance wrote:Exactly what evidence is there of no soul?
I this case, I believe, no one will even agree which side of the argument is the extraordinary claim. No evidence of a soul is not evidence of no soul.
I hope that made sense.
Skeptics don't disbelieve in the soul because its existence has been disproved: rather, they don't believe in it because its existence has not yet been proved. It's Occam's Razor.Lance wrote:... sometimes I think some of the skeptics are as bad in their thinking as the woo woos. Exactly what evidence is there of no soul?
I don't. Extraordinary claims require just the same degree of evidence as trivial claims - or, at least, they should. It may be that some people refuse to believe something extraordinary until they have been shown extraordinary evidence, but that's another matter entirely.Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Yeah, we all know that.
True, but it is clear which side of the argument is multiplying entities without necessity.I this case, I believe, no one will even agree which side of the argument is the extraordinary claim.
Irrefutable. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Of course, this argument can be applied to a lot of other things, from Father Christmas to the chocolate covered rock in the asteroid belt that hasn't yet been found (but we're still looking :D ).No evidence of a soul is not evidence of no soul.
You always make sense, Lance. :wink:I hope that made sense.
Bill EE wrote:You know Cl1mh4224rd - the best part of that link you gave was:Her husband, Bruce, remains skeptical. "He started researching to disprove what James was telling us, and ended up proving it all," he said. "I think he believes that James Huston's spirit has manifested itself in our son somehow."
Look at that - did research and it went against his original hypothesis. Some woo-woo could learn from that.
Bill EE wrote:If I see a light in the sky that I can not identify and then claim "that is a Vegan Type II explorer saucer here to scout out a good invasion starting point," then I better have some extraordinary evidence to back it up!
I Am He wrote:Reincarnation does not hold water. Where would all the souls come from? Don't forget there was that many people around to start with.
umop ap!sdn wrote:However, another factor that is involved is that these "immediate" past lives seem to always be relatively short and culminate in a sudden, maybe traumatic, death. That's true for mine as well as the OP's. So, it may just be that those who leave the world unexpectedly tend to return quickly, or this may just reflect a tendency for similar minded individuals to run across the same online and real life hangouts.
Lance wrote:Bill EE wrote:If I see a light in the sky that I can not identify and then claim "that is a Vegan Type II explorer saucer here to scout out a good invasion starting point," then I better have some extraordinary evidence to back it up!
And this is why it's important. I saw that light too and I am certain that it was a Vegan Type III explorer saucer.
umop ap!sdn wrote:I Am He wrote:Reincarnation does not hold water. Where would all the souls come from? Don't forget there was that many people around to start with.
Where would they come from? I don't have a definite answer for that.
MM_Dandy wrote:If I commit a crime, can I blame it on my soul if it previously possessed a criminal?
Return to Religion and Spirituality
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests