Illuminati-R-Us

Lance wrote:

Animal wrote:Amen.

Just a side note from pastor to pastor:

In our new-found faith, the proper ending to a prayer or blessing is:
Ramen

I'm reformed, not othordox.

Animal wrote:Being "in His Noodles" means that I am in His hands, if he had hands, which He doesn't, so I'm not.

Dear Rabies Carrier:

Ah, I was going by the "Both camps are equal moronic" subject, and assumed you would not refer to yourself as moronic. But upon further reflection, that was an unwarranted assumption, so I retract the earlier comment.

Никита

Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:

Animal wrote:Being "in His Noodles" means that I am in His hands, if he had hands, which He doesn't, so I'm not.

Dear Rabies Carrier:

Ah, I was going by the "Both camps are equal moronic" subject, and assumed you would not refer to yourself as moronic. But upon further reflection, that was an unwarranted assumption, so I retract the earlier comment.

Никита

Mr. Product-of-the-Westfalika-company,

We must do something about your alternative naming conventions. So far its been "beast" and "rabbies carrier". While both of these might be true, they are not 100% guarenteed as are my names for you.

An Animal does not have to be a beast, but all beasts must be an animal. Likewise with being a rabies carrier.

Now my alternative name for you were always of things which had to be some form of "shoe". While a shoe didn't have to be the name I used, the name did need to be some form of shoe. (Socks are considered undergarmets and not footwear.)

There is a whole zoological plethora of alternative names for an animal. I'd start with Monkey and work my way down the evolutionary ladder.

Messrs. has the potential to become road-kill and could quite possibly wreak of jungle rot,

I have nothing meaningfull to add to the conversation. I just wanted to start a post as above.

Thank you.

Please carry on.

Animal wrote:Mr. Product-of-the-Westfalika-company,

Mr. He-who-wishes-to-be-called-monkey,

We must do something about your alternative naming conventions. So far its been "beast" and "rabbies carrier".

I'm sorry you did not like them. I meant only the highest form of honor and respect by these names.

While both of these might be true, they are not 100% guarenteed as are my names for you.

This latter claim is most demonstrably false. All shoes are products of the Westfalika company? I don't think so. And what is Willis-inkovich? This sounds like a bad attempt at Russian, best used when the owner of a shoe is Russian, not Ukrainian, as was Premier Khrushchev.

An Animal does not have to be a beast, but all beasts must be an animal. Likewise with being a rabies carrier.

No problem so far...

Now my alternative name for you were always of things which had to be some form of "shoe". While a shoe didn't have to be the name I used, the name did need to be some form of shoe. (Socks are considered undergarmets and not footwear.)

Now you have switched sides - this is perfectly analogous to my names for you. Take the second sentence, and make the appropriate substitutions: While an animal didn't have to be the name I used, the name did need to be some form of animal.

Did you get confused? Must be the effect of that rabies...

There is a whole zoological plethora of alternative names for an animal. I'd start with Monkey and work my way down the evolutionary ladder.

Always ready to accomodate, Mr. Monkey,

Никита

Lance wrote:I have nothing meaningfull to add to the conversation.

Mr. Medieval Weapon,

Neither do I.

Никита

Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:Mr. Medieval Weapon,

You misspelled "Well Suited for Thrusting".

Lance wrote:You misspelled "Well Suited for Thrusting".

I thought that would be more appropriate for the Longwang thread...

Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:

Lance wrote:You misspelled "Well Suited for Thrusting".

I thought that would be more appropriate for the Longwang thread...

Good point.

Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:

Animal wrote:Mr. Product-of-the-Westfalika-company,

Mr. He-who-wishes-to-be-called-monkey,

This latter claim is most demonstrably false. All shoes are products of the Westfalika company? I don't think so. And what is Willis-inkovich? This sounds like a bad attempt at Russian, best used when the owner of a shoe is Russian, not Ukrainian, as was Premier Khrushchev.

Никита

I'm cutting out all the other crap 'cause I'm too tired to mess with nested tuote tags.

First, no, not all shoes are made by the Westfalika, but the Westfalika company only makes shoes.

The "Willis-inkovich" bit was a russianization (another new word I just made up) of the old Different Strokes catch phrase from the 70's. As this was an alliteration and not an actual name, it doesn't count.

So which one of my alternative names for you can be something other than a shoe? I forget.

Animal wrote:So which one of my alternative names for you can be something other than a shoe? I forget.

None that I recall, which is the point. Which one of my alternative names for you can be something other than an animal?

Никита

Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:

Animal wrote:So which one of my alternative names for you can be something other than a shoe? I forget.

None that I recall, which is the point. Which one of my alternative names for you can be something other than an animal?

Никита

None. What are we arguing about again?

{you'll have to excuse me... something happened recently which is still giving me the giggles and making it hard to concentrate.}

Animal wrote:None. What are we arguing about again?

You said I was not using good alternative names like you were, and then drew a perfect analogy between yours and mine.

{you'll have to excuse me... something happened recently which is still giving me the giggles and making it hard to concentrate.}

I believe you!

Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:

Animal wrote:{you'll have to excuse me... something happened recently which is still giving me the giggles and making it hard to concentrate.}

I believe you!

I'll vouch for that... I was there, right there, in the big stinking tub with him.

Apparently some Chinese diggers have uncovered the oldest known examples of His Noodly Appendage while uncovering some buried village in Chine. of course, the secularists are downplaying the whole thing by trying to explain how His Noodles are made and how other people can make their own at any time.

The original story is here.