Page 1 of 1

Centaur (Partial Nude)

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:35 am
by Lance

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:18 am
by umop ap!sdn
Hmm that's neat. :)

I've seen actually a pic where they merged a woman kneeling over with the same model standing up, and created a centaur figure. Even added a horse's tail.

This approach seems more like a natural entity.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:18 am
by Lonewulf
Doesn't show up for me for some reason.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:08 pm
by Lance
Lonewulf wrote:Doesn't show up for me for some reason.

How about now?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:10 pm
by Мастер
I couldn't see it also, but I can now. One part is much nicer than the other.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:12 pm
by Lance
Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:One part is much nicer than the other.

Oh, you like girls?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:13 pm
by Мастер
No

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:25 pm
by Lance
Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:No

So, it's horses then?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 2:31 pm
by Nighthawk
:glp-rotflmao:

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 3:06 pm
by Lonewulf
Yummy.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 3:37 pm
by Lance
Okay, I confess. I set KOS up. My post originally said:
Lance wrote:
Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:One part is much nicer than the other.

Oh, you like horses?


To which KOS replied:
Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:No.


I then changed horses to girls in my earlier post and posted this after KOS' reply:
Lance wrote:So, it's horses then?


Sorry KOS. I still love you.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 3:42 pm
by Lonewulf
But editing posts makes it too easy...

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:52 pm
by pmcolt
Reminds me of Futurama for some reason.

Why couldn't she have been the other kind of mermaid?! The one with the fish part on top, and the lady part on the bottom?!


Nice pic, but it seems a shame to ruin a perfectly good girl by putting her on a not-terribly-attractive horse.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:29 am
by umop ap!sdn
Lance wrote:I set KOS up.

OK that makes sense now. I knew the obvious conclusion couldn't possibly be correct. :P

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:12 am
by Мастер
umop ap!sdn wrote:I knew the obvious conclusion couldn't possibly be correct. :P


The obvious conclusion, that Lance is a conniving, treacherous, wicked, evil administrator, is the correct conclusion!

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:40 am
by teri tait
Lance wrote:Okay, I confess. I set KOS up. My post originally said:
Lance wrote:
Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:One part is much nicer than the other.

Oh, you like horses?


To which KOS replied:
Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:No.


I then changed horses to girls in my earlier post and posted this after KOS' reply:
Lance wrote:So, it's horses then?


Sorry KOS. I still love you.


KOS is a shoe-in for most often sucker trapped award. :)

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:38 am
by Lance
Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:The obvious conclusion, that Lance is a conniving, treacherous, wicked, evil administrator, is the correct conclusion!

Moi?

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:50 am
by teri tait
Lance wrote:
Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:The obvious conclusion, that Lance is a conniving, treacherous, wicked, evil administrator, is the correct conclusion!

Moi?


LMAO, if the shoe fits...

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:24 am
by Enzo
Is that a NEIGHbor?

I'm feeling my oats I can tell you.

Nice horsey. The mane attraction so far.

Look, a perfect 34-24-8 hands.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:26 am
by teri tait
Enzo wrote:Is that a NEIGHbor?

I'm feeling my oats I can tell you.

Nice horsey. The mane attraction so far.

Look, a perfect 34-24-8 hands.


Yep, it definitly takes Centaur Aisle

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:28 am
by Enzo
REady for a role in the hay.