Bill_Thompson wrote:
Bill_Thompson wrote:His firmness and the bloodshed imposed on Iraq was necessary for keeping the overall stability and peace and well being of Iraq.
Lance wrote:Bill_Thompson wrote:
Hot-linking avatars in posts is not a good idea. It will make no sense when KOS changes it. Link to an image on CNN or something,
Superluminal wrote:(3) Saddam believed he was the next Saladin.
Bill_Thompson wrote:(#1) I have been told that there is some legal gray area here by people who have served and been stationed in the Middle East. I have been told that there are some international laws on the books which one could point to that suggest that the country of Kuwait was not legitimate and that Iraq had some claim to that land.
(#4) We had and have secret military bases in Saudi Arabia. Saddam was told about these bases. He did not know that they were American bases. He only knew that they were military bases, and those they were freaking huge, and that they were right on his border. Saddam felt that the Arab world was coming in on him. He had to do something to flex his muscles and show that he was still a player.
(#5) Turkey had done something similar with another country not too long before the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Saddam did not have any way of knowing or imagining that Bush Senior would have taken the action that he did.
Heid the Ba' wrote:Bill Thompson wrote:(#5) Turkey had done something similar with another country not too long before the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Saddam did not have any way of knowing or imagining that Bush Senior would have taken the action that he did.
Where did Turkey do this? From memory the only countries with land borders with Turkey are Greece (I would have heard), the Soviet Union which was still relatively intact (I doubt they would have stood for it) and Iraq, Iran and Syria, (again not the types to put up with it).
Heid the Ba' wrote:I had forgotten Cyprus, it being so long ago. . .
The international community didn't just stand by it forced a ceasefire, though as yet no resolution to the problem.
Heid the Ba' wrote:It is good for us as well: while we subsidise Central Europe we have access to large numbers of mobile, trained workers; important when you have an ageing and declining population.
Heid the Ba wrote:Not sure about the €uro though, I have no idea if it would be good for us. what is good is that everyone else is in it since it saves fannying about with a dozen different currencies.
And now a return to your scheduled thread . . .
Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:Heid the Ba' wrote:It is good for us as well: while we subsidise Central Europe we have access to large numbers of mobile, trained workers; important when you have an ageing and declining population.
Including plumbers :P Did you hear what the Polish tourism ministry did with him?
A curious situation Scotland is in, it is theoretically devolving from a UK that is theoretically integrating into the EU :P
Heid the Ba' wrote:Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:Including plumbers :P Did you hear what the Polish tourism ministry did with him?
No I missed that.
Return to Current Events and Politics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests