Bill_Thompson wrote:Why don't we just go ahead and elect a Scientologist?
Bill_Thompson wrote:Sir,
I am a little shocked and troubled by the Mormon Theology. Our country was founded during the age of enlightenment when men choose reason and logic over scripture and dogma. And yet, many people consider the Mormon church to be created by an opportunist who road the backlash to the Industrial Revolution. Multiple Gods, the idea of living a good live to become a God, believing that the creater of life on Earth is basically a space being who lives on another star system are all ideas that the rest of the industralised world will laugh at us if you become president. I think the media attention given to you lately is because the media is mostly liberal and you are the most beatable candidate if Hillary wins the Democratic nomination. Have you considered dropping out of the race for the good of the country?
pmcolt wrote:Bill_Thompson wrote:Sir,
I am a little shocked and troubled by the Mormon Theology. Our country was founded during the age of enlightenment when men choose reason and logic over scripture and dogma. And yet, many people consider the Mormon church to be created by an opportunist who road the backlash to the Industrial Revolution. Multiple Gods, the idea of living a good live to become a God, believing that the creater of life on Earth is basically a space being who lives on another star system are all ideas that the rest of the industralised world will laugh at us if you become president. I think the media attention given to you lately is because the media is mostly liberal and you are the most beatable candidate if Hillary wins the Democratic nomination. Have you considered dropping out of the race for the good of the country?
I have no issue with electing a man of faith, whether that faith be Protestant, Catholicism, Mormonism, or Robotology. After all, is the belief in the apotheosis of humankind any crazier than the belief that my lottery ticket is going to be the powerball winner?
...
Bill_Thompson wrote:Where do you draw the line?
Would you elect a suicide death cult member?
Would you believe in someone who believed in Voo Doo?
Would you believe in someone who believed in multiple Gods?
Would you vote for someone whose goal is to become a God?
Or that the planet Venis is populated by vixens waiting for men to mate with them in the after-life.
We are talking about a wacked-out space alien cult, not some Protestant, Catholicism, Mormonism, or Robotology.
How can someone be a man of faith when the man does not have faith in a supreme being?
You see, this is how Hillary is going to win. The media is going to give lots of positive spin on Romney so he gets the Republican tap. Then the media will turn on him so that their candidate wins.
We produced a piece of animation to show you what Mormon Theology is really all about.
Enzo wrote:AS an aside, outfundraising is not the whole deal. Here in Michigan, in the last gubernatorial election, the challenger outspent the incumbent almost 4 to 1 and still lost big. SOmething like $57million to 17million. Hmm, well over 3 to 1.
Khrushchev's Other Shoe wrote:People (I do not refer to pmcolt, who did not say this) like to say that money is all that matters in American politics.
Dragon Star wrote:Dragons like Crystals, you know...
Lance wrote:Heh, Crystal is old enough to be your, well, "hot older girlfriend".
Dragon Star wrote:Did you just admit that Crystal is hot?
pmcolt wrote:Bill_Thompson wrote:Where do you draw the line?
Why should I draw a line? The primary duty of the President is to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. If I think he can do the job, I'll vote for him. If I don't, then I won't. As far as his personal beliefs, my only expectation is that they don't interfere with his official duties.
Return to Current Events and Politics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests