Illuminati-R-Us

Posted: **Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:55 pm**

I have no idea if I'm doing this right . . .

e^(pi*i)+1

Posted: **Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:10 am**

It looks right to me.

39

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:58 pm**

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:38 pm**

sqrt(-1)

Posted: **Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:17 pm**

.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999

Posted: **Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:38 pm**

.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999~

Posted: **Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:12 am**

Posted: **Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:13 am**

[strike]1[/strike]

Posted: **Sat Dec 12, 2009 5:08 pm**

One is the loneliest number.

Posted: **Sun Dec 13, 2009 4:43 am**

2 can be as sad as 1.

Posted: **Sun Dec 13, 2009 4:49 am**

It's the loneliest number, since the number one.

Posted: **Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:48 pm**

Sorry, that is not Numberwang.

Posted: **Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:24 pm**

Posted: **Wed Apr 07, 2010 1:44 pm**

That's Numberwang!

Posted: **Wed Apr 07, 2010 5:09 pm**

OK, my turn - what's Numberwang?

Posted: **Fri Apr 09, 2010 3:34 pm**

This will be the Wangernumb round then.

87

Posted: **Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:20 am**

nnnnu...nuu..ni
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTQfGd3G6dg

Posted: **Thu Apr 15, 2010 1:52 pm**

Posted: **Thu Apr 15, 2010 3:36 pm**

Posted: **Fri Apr 16, 2010 8:01 am**

Posted: **Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:52 pm**

Nope, not Wangernumb, all of them. Think BIG.

Posted: **Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:45 pm**

Bigger than 273? Do such numbers exist?

Graham's number.

Posted: **Mon Apr 26, 2010 4:57 pm**

Oh sure; you got the right smell in your nose, though.

Posted: **Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:35 am**

Yes, 273 is ridiculous. It would require the hands of 27 plus one severely injured person to count that high. Putting accountants right out of business.

The number can be greater than six, but must be smaller than 11.

Posted: **Sun Sep 18, 2011 4:59 am**

eight