Illuminati-R-Us

Disinfo Agent wrote:so what are the circle things that i have one of yet other people have more of ?

They go up as your post count increases.

just like that number that says "posts" ?



modern technology eh

Disinfo Agent wrote:just like that number that says "posts" ?



modern technology eh

I think you are growing pretty fast... love the shorts...

So is "Bite Me!" what you want there, Candy? Or would you prefer something else?

I really don't care anymore.

Lance wrote:I noticed it conflicted with the "real" banned status such that it was unselectable. I don't quite get that, but I had to remove the fake status. I changed it so it reads "Whack Job" now.

Do you want that instead?

I managed to "BAN" Candy by using a slight variation. Obviously, you are any moderator can fix that if she complains.

Testes, one, two...

I like it!!!! \:D/

Nifty! :D Although (and why didn't I think of this before) it might also work without the asterisks if you just had an   or &#160 ; after BANNED.

Actually, the "real" banned status not showing up was due to an entirely unrelated stupid mistake on my part. The "multiple-ranks" mod handles banned and guest status differently than phpBB did before. It's not supposed to show up as selectable. It gets automatically assigned to anyone who has a status of "BANNED" instead of needing to be manually assigned.

That all said...

I have a problem with someone having a status that makes it appear they were banned but can still post. For one thing, it makes me look like I don't really know how to ban someone. And for another, it makes light of something that should be serious. Not everyone posting here may know Candy or things that have happened in the past.

So, sorry sweetie but pick something else.

BANNED
(Everywhere but here)

was cute.

How about now? :)

Heh...

That's cool.

:?

Candy wrote::?

?

Can you put Lover of Cox under my name? :P

This is the best one yet. :D

Yeah!

I stop posting for a while and when I come back things have gotten weirder (if that's possible).

I think I'll swear off redheads for a while and stick with brunettes.

Yes, it has been bad without you neocracker. Maybe it'll settle down now that you're back.

Lance wrote:Yes, it has been bad without you neocracker. Maybe it'll settle down now that you're back.

Yeah right.

You should see the mood I'm in after pulling a ten hour day at work - I work 4/10 (l do, however, love that three day weekend).

What interesting things have happened since I stopped posting regularly in the middle of June? I have noticed that Candy is now going by "lover of cox".

Tom

Need I say more. :P

Lover of Cox

im sure there is a subliminal message hidden in that but i cant quite put my finger on it

:)

The day I was to meet Dr Brian Cox at the airport, I called Reservations to check on his flight. The lady asked me how to spell his last name. I said, "How would you spell his last name?" We both started laughing.

Brian said when you was touring with his band in the 80's, people thought his last name was a stage name. I didn't ask, but I bet that boy did a lot of shagging in his day. :P

umop ap!sdn wrote:Not everywhere. You're not banned here, for instance.

Yet

j/k

mickal555 wrote:

umop ap!sdn wrote:Not everywhere. You're not banned here, for instance.

Yet

j/k

The folks are too nice on your board, mickal. I've never seen anyone even argue on your board. You had that one weird poster that was mean to me, but I don't think he/she has been back for awhile. :)

Too nice?

Is that a bad thing...

That other guy won't be back D.w