Мастер wrote:I like this one best of all, so far at least.
Enzo wrote:I see them the same way Arneb does, all look good but the first.
Enzo wrote:As to the math, well..... way over my head. I was a physics major 50 some years ago, but it didn't stick.
Мастер wrote:Huh. I wrote a long, detailed response to Arneb's post, but I don't see it now.
Lance wrote:Мастер wrote:Huh. I wrote a long, detailed response to Arneb's post, but I don't see it now.
Perhaps you saved it as a draft?
Мастер wrote:I can see a "Save as draft" option at the bottom when posting, but I can't find where they go if you choose it. Where are the drafts?
Lance wrote:Мастер wrote:I can see a "Save as draft" option at the bottom when posting, but I can't find where they go if you choose it. Where are the drafts?
User Control Panel -> Manage Drafts
Arneb wrote:Mactep, not that I could follow you (that's far above my level of math) - but your first equations come out as code on my screen, while all the others come out as sleek-looking Tex equations style.
Arneb wrote:But maybe I get your argument verbally this time: Since Earth and counter-Earth have non-negligeable masses, they would have to have the same distance from the Sun in order to be at eacho other's L3 .
Arneb wrote:Therefore, they would not share the same orbit but would be in two otherwise identical orbits with their perihelia and aphelia oriented at 180° from each other.
Arneb wrote:Therefore, they would NOT necessarily deviate from their exactly opposite positions wrt the Sun, as they would be in perihelion, aphelion, or any other equivalent points of their respective orbits all the time
Мастер wrote:I don't think I imagined writing the response
Return to Astronomy / Cosmology / Physics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests