Mr. Manly wrote:As you know there have been numerous exercises since 9/11 but no more attacks.
Mr. Manly wrote:I can't speak to whether there were exercises on 9/11 or 7/7 but I do know that the fearmongers on GLP throw this out everytime an exercise is announced. As you know there have been numerous exercises since 9/11 but no more attacks. I say be vigilant as you normally would but take warnings from GLP with a grain of salt as the track record there is 0 for like 1000 for accuracy.
Superluminal wrote:Down here in the south we're used to the Army Guard coming in after tornado's hit small towns and securing the area, arresting looters and restoring order. Of course a nuke would be a tornado Xs what, about a million? Assuming the gov. not totally destroyed, I believe martial law would be terminated as soon as order could be restored. It won't be 2 or 3 days like a bad storm. I'm more worried about the reaction of people in general. Reprisals against Muslims and such.
sakuraba wrote:It depends on the kind of nukes. Suitcase nukes wouldn't do such a catastrophic damage as warheads. But local governments could be destroyed and martial law would last long. I just hope they don't use warheads as the destruction would be bigger. Even then, it would depend on the amount of kilotons the weapon/weapons was made of :(
in Syria there has been martial law for 40 years
Superluminal wrote:KOS Wrotein Syria there has been martial law for 40 years
But before that was Syria a stable democracy?
Or have a constitution to fall back on after what ever crisis past?
Or was that when the Assads siezed power for themselves?
Superluminal wrote:With America's history, I think if we were forced to declare martial law, we would have a pretty good chance of returning to normal. Look back at our cival war. If we survived that we should be able to deal with a few months of martial law.
sakuraba wrote:I am not so good with debunking or answering to woowoos,
but tell me if this is correct please:
Although Tesla mentioned that to explode weapons with the frequency of the earth every time the wave comes back, over a long period of time could produce the effect of shattering the earth, an all-out nuclear war would not produce such effect since the explosions would not coincide with the earth's frequency and most importantly, the explosions would be spread in different places, therefore not allowing the energy to focus on making a stronger wave that could shatter the earth. A nuclear war would also not last long enough for the wave to cause the shattering of earth, since the exhange would be spread and quick, rather than focused on a spot, timed and long.
Does this look like a good answer to give to the woowoo?
Bill EE wrote:[engineer mode]
Well the other problem is that "shattering" something a its resonance frequency requires that object not have a lot of losses at that frequency. For example, if a opera singer hit the resonance frequency of a glass, and can hold it long enough, it will shatter. This occurs because the glass is a good conductor of vibrations (sound travels in to with little loss). At the resonance frequency the vibration enter on one side of the glass and are reflected back into the glass at the other side (due the mismatch between the glass and the air). This creates a standing wave whose energy is constantly increasing as long as the singer keeps hitting the right note. The nice thing about this technique is you can exchange time for power. You send a signal with less power than required to shatter something but you send it for a much longer time. The energy build up in the target until it shatters.
The earth is not a homogenous structure so it doesn't have a single resonance frequency to hit. In addition, while the earth conducts vibrations fairly well it certainly isn't lossless. Tesla was, I believe, talking about using EM wave to do the job - the earth is even less lossless for EM waves.
[/engineer mode]
Bill EE wrote:Let me try a different approach. ...
Return to Conspiracy Theories and Hoaxes
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests