Illuminati-R-Us

Great. All I need now is a paid government debunker to deny it, and then we can consider it as fact. Dr. P? Are you around today? Unless you were talking about GLP becoming self-aware. I think that would actually qualify as the biblical End Times. Yeah, really. It would probably go crazy looking fo...

Plausable...

It's the images in that thread. The source server is dragging.

They crashed entirely, but they're back up now and I can get in fine.

Maybe their database took a look at all the crap it had in it and tried to flee.

I'm noticing that too...

It can't be the porn. That's my cablemodem. The servers are on the DSL line. (See Here)

It might be SBC. I'll keep an eye on it.

ToSeek wrote:I'm having the same problem.

Wasn't there a thread here recently where we accused MM_Dandy of being one of "them"? I'd say this is more evidence in support if that.

MM_Dandy wrote:Working just fine for me.

Of course, I don't ruffle as many feathers over there. 8)

Ruffle feathers? How? Do you mean like, by calling someone a brain-dead moron?

MM_Dandy wrote:Looks like your not the only one.

Unless this is you.

Nope, that's not me. I replied to it though.

I'm not sure this is a big loss anyway, but I can't log in to GLP for some reason. It's been acting this way for ~20 minutes or so. Is anyone else having trouble or did I manage to get myself banned somehow?

From the BABB: Now that I've gotten your attention, no, this thread isn't about some recently published paper that supports astrology. It is, however, about a test that we're doing right here on the BABB. In a thread discussing astrology, gzhpcu made a statement that he's made before, that he invest...

I agree twinstead and that is a good point. Sometimes I think the debunkers get a little over zealous, which, IMHO, doesn't do well for our credibility collectively. Take the thread Rectangular boulder image from Eros at BABB for example. There's obviously a big rock sitting in a crater. A funny sha...

MM_Dandy wrote:

Candy wrote:I know DO is just dying to know what a dingle berry is - it is a turd caught in the fur of a critter. For example, a critter, is a small animal like a cat.

Huh, I always thought they were called 'klingons.'

Only when circling Uranus.

twinstead wrote:That said, I think it was lens flare.

They just want you to think it was a lens flare.

Very good!

Here you go...

So is "Bite Me!" what you want there, Candy? Or would you prefer something else?

Disinfo Agent wrote:so what are the circle things that i have one of yet other people have more of ?

They go up as your post count increases.

Candy wrote:It's that Paid Debunker thing that I don't like.

I like the Bite Me!, though.

Oh... That's just the rank associated with your post count. In 50 more posts you'll get "Illuminatus" and a fifth circle. Is that better?

Candy wrote:

Lance wrote:Sure...

bite me

Is that what you want?

Sure...

Sure thing. :) Does this mean we can post HTML now? [html]<marquee direction=up height=25 behavior=alternate> http://www.umop.net/smileys/all_teeth.gif </marquee>[/html] Edit: Guess not. :? The moderators and I can. It's a bit dangerous to leave open to the general public. Heh... See what happens w...

I don't see it either, Candy. I removed it, changed it, and am saving it for future use.

I noticed it conflicted with the "real" banned status such that it was unselectable. I don't quite get that, but I had to remove the fake status. I changed it so it reads "Whack Job" now.

Do you want that instead?

Okay, thanks. That's what I thought.

I wanted to see if table would survive being quoted.

It obviously didn't. Thanks again.

[html]<table align=center border=1>
<tr>
<td>Someone, anyone, please quote this and reply.</td>
</tr>
</table>[/html]

umop ap!sdn wrote:Not everywhere. You're not banned here, for instance.

I had "Almost everywhere but here" to start with, but it wrapped to a second line and didn't look good.

umop ap!sdn wrote: