Illuminati-R-Us

by **Bill_Thompson** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:03 pm

It is kind of nutty to lock discussion threads here.

Wasn't this area created as a repository for vented nonsense?

Raising the standard now will cause the creation of an even wacker trashbin.

by **umop ap!sdn** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 10:39 pm

Well, in the case of this thread, it was originally locked because the discussion was getting out of hand, then subsequently unlocked. When the discussion again went down the drain, I again locked it. Aside from that one, and one other thread that ran beyond its useful life expectancy, I see no threads of any significance on page 1 of this forum that have been locked.

by **Lonewulf** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:22 pm

Define "out of hand", though. I mean, if every thread is shut down because of Bill Thompson's nonsense, one has to wonder at what power he REALLY has...

Food for thought. Or maybe thoughts for food. Dunno.

by **Dragon Star** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 12:31 am

Although I agree, that thread really did need to be locked because it got personal on a whole different level.

by **Bill_Thompson** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:22 am

umop ap!sdn wrote:Well, in the case of this thread, it was originally locked because the discussion was getting out of hand, then subsequently unlocked. When the discussion again went down the drain, I again locked it. Aside from that one, and one other thread that ran beyond its useful life expectancy, I see no threads of any significance on page 1 of this forum that have been locked.

Oh wow. I did not even know you were a moderator. Cool.

Anyway, I do not see why any thread should ever be locked in these sort of places. I have given up thinking that some people have anything of value to read. So I just don't read them. If a subject matter is something fun that I can contribute to, then I contribute to it. If someone that I think is intelligent responds to it, then I read it. Otherwise I just skim over it. Why should I waste my time reading posts from people I have no respect for?

And so it comes as a suprise when a thread is locked. If something gets out of hand and people get hot under the collar, then it is their own fault for letting themselves get angry.

by **Dragon Star** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:30 am

Bill, considering your the only person that cares, no one gives a damn.

by **Lonewulf** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 12:22 pm

Dragon Star wrote:Although I agree, that thread really did need to be locked because it got personal on a whole different level.

Well, true. I probably just got too used to Bill Thompson's personal attacks to really consider them anything new or shocking.

by **umop ap!sdn** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:41 pm

Bill_Thompson wrote:Oh wow. I did not even know you were a moderator. Cool.

For something like, gosh I can't believe it's been over 4 months now. But I'm actually a moderatrix. Same powers only instead of a magic wand I got a magic tiara.

by **Dragon Star** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 5:20 pm

umop ap!sdn wrote:
Bill_Thompson wrote:Oh wow. I did not even know you were a moderator. Cool.

For something like, gosh I can't believe it's been over 4 months now. But I'm actually a moderatrix. Same powers only instead of a magic wand I got a magic tiara.

In case you missed the intent of his message umop, he was mocking you.

by **Doe, John** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:53 am

Dragon Star wrote:
umop ap!sdn wrote:
Bill_Thompson wrote:Oh wow. I did not even know you were a moderator. Cool.

For something like, gosh I can't believe it's been over 4 months now. But I'm actually a moderatrix. Same powers only instead of a magic wand I got a magic tiara.

In case you missed the intent of his message umop, he was mocking you.

Not wanting to put words in her mouth, but from the general tone of her reply, I believe she was aware of his intent and was returning the favor.

iow, nss. :D

by **Dragon Star** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 2:15 am

That's why I stuck "In case" in there. :D

by **Lonewulf** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:04 am

umop ap!sdn wrote:For something like, gosh I can't believe it's been over 4 months now. But I'm actually a moderatrix. Same powers only instead of a magic wand I got a magic tiara.

What would a moderatrix do with a tiara? Isn't it just a subset of dominatrix?

I thought they used leather and bondage gear.

by **Enzo** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:36 am

Bondage...James Bondage

by **hippietrekx** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:44 am

Enzo wrote:Bondage...James Bondage

Hee hee. Never let Jimmy see this...

--hipster

by **St. Jimmy** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:53 am

hippietrekx wrote:
Enzo wrote:Bondage...James Bondage

Hee hee. Never let Jimmy see this...

--hipster

I saw it

:P

by **Bill_Thompson** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:09 am

umop ap!sdn wrote:
Bill_Thompson wrote:Oh wow. I did not even know you were a moderator. Cool.

For something like, gosh I can't believe it's been over 4 months now. But I'm actually a moderatrix. Same powers only instead of a magic wand I got a magic tiara.

This must be an inside joke.

Or maybe it is a far outside joke.

by **umop ap!sdn** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:37 pm

Doe, John wrote:Not wanting to put words in her mouth, but from the general tone of her reply, I believe she was aware of his intent and was returning the favor.

If I had been, my response would have been the same. Yep, I stand by it now. :D

Lonewulf wrote:What would a moderatrix do with a tiara? Isn't it just a subset of dominatrix?

I keep telling people, it's only the feminine ending of the word. Basic latin. :mrgreen:

I don't run around in chains and leather with a whip, honest.

by **Doe, John** » Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:13 am

umop ap!sdn wrote:
Doe, John wrote:Not wanting to put words in her mouth, but from the general tone of her reply, I believe she was aware of his intent and was returning the favor.

If I had been, my response would have been the same. Yep, I stand by it now. :D

Lonewulf wrote:What would a moderatrix do with a tiara? Isn't it just a subset of dominatrix?

I keep telling people, it's only the feminine ending of the word. Basic latin. I don't run around in chains and leather with a whip, honest.

damn, another fantasy shot all to hell. :wink:

by **Enzo** » Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:58 am

I'd just assumed a moderatrix was like a dominatrix, but less extreme, more... moderate.

Maybe not leather, but vinyl.

Not handcuffs, but Velcro.

by **umop ap!sdn** » Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:20 am

Hmm vinyl and velcro. I could go with that. :mrgreen:

by **Enzo** » Thu Jul 27, 2006 7:47 am

A kinder, gentler dominatrix.

by **Dragon Star** » Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:54 pm

Doe, John wrote:
umop ap!sdn wrote:
Doe, John wrote:Not wanting to put words in her mouth, but from the general tone of her reply, I believe she was aware of his intent and was returning the favor.

If I had been, my response would have been the same. Yep, I stand by it now. :D

Lonewulf wrote:What would a moderatrix do with a tiara? Isn't it just a subset of dominatrix?

I keep telling people, it's only the feminine ending of the word. Basic latin. I don't run around in chains and leather with a whip, honest.

damn, another fantasy shot all to hell. :wink:

Another thread shot to hell as well. :lol:

Illuminati-R-Us

Infuriati (The Enraged Ones)

Infuriati (The Enraged Ones)

Who is online