Page 1 of 1
There's a llaw for that
Posted:
Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:33 amby MM_Dandy
Just came across
this in my Twitter feed:
@CrimeADay wrote:7 USC §§8306, 8313 & 9 CFR §93.412(d)(3)(ii) make it a federal crime to keep llamas in a medium or minimum security llama quarantine facility if it’s not properly designed to prevent the escape of quarantined llamas.
Note that it says nothing about
maximum security llama quarantine facilities. That's because of the super-powerful IRU llobbyests, you know.
Re: There's a llaw for that
Posted:
Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:50 amby tubeswell
Llong Llive the Llama King!
Re: There's a llaw for that
Posted:
Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:25 amby Heid the Ba
"minimum security llama quarantine facility" how did I get to be this old and not know such places exist?
Re: There's a llaw for that
Posted:
Mon Mar 01, 2021 11:43 amby Мастер
Heid the Ba wrote:"minimum security llama quarantine facility" how did I get to be this old and not know such places exist?
How, you haven't heard of the MSLQF? Not to be confused with the maximum security llama quarantine facility, called MSLQF.
Re: There's a llaw for that
Posted:
Mon Mar 01, 2021 11:48 amby Heid the Ba
Or a medium security MSLQF.
Re: There's a llaw for that
Posted:
Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:57 pmby Enzo
Are llamas that are MSLQF able to use the bathroom of their chosen identity?
Re: There's a llaw for that
Posted:
Tue Mar 02, 2021 2:39 amby MM_Dandy
Well, if it's anything like the MSLQFs that I've seen, the facilities are a one-size-fits-all system.
Re: There's a llaw for that
Posted:
Tue Mar 02, 2021 3:08 amby tubeswell
In fact one could say that one-size-fits-all bathrooms represent the shitty side of MSLQFs
Re: There's a llaw for that
Posted:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:13 pmby Lance
Damn it!
Now I need to raise the fences and fortify the gates. This is going to be expensive.