Superluminal wrote:They would argue and argue, and pass resolution after resolution, the U.S. would be forced to act unilaterally and do the only thing that we can do with our present technology: Fire a couple of nukes at it and hope for the best. Then, if we're succesfull at saving the world, they'll pass a resolution condeming the U.S. for using nukes in space.
Don't know whether to laugh or cry at that. Too true. ^
I think it was Stuart Slade who said on another board (in reference to the missile defense shield) that as it stands now, if a nuclear missile is fired at us, within seconds we know where and when it will hit. For the minutes it takes to arrive, we know this and there is absolutely nothing we can do to prevent it. How would that feel?
Same thing with asteroids, except that timeframe could range from months to centuries. Should we have a plan in place to deflect it?
The geologic history of Earth and all planets / moons indicates it is not a matter of if, but when we are hit by a lethal impact.
If it will be in 100,000 years, foolish to spend money and resources building a system to stop it.
Suppose we detect a lethal object less than a decade from impact. We know this, and there is not enough time to prevent it.
I do not propose we do the “chicken little” thing and pour unlimited resources into building a system to prevent this very unlikely event. I do propose a contingency plan (coupled with other space exploration ventures in a synergistic fashion) to be able to deal with such an event in short (months) order. Know you can do it, if you have to do it.
My modest proposition is to get the world to agree to move the calendar ahead (or behind) by a day, so it misses us by that margin. Works with daylight savings time and the sun … :wink: